Are You Ready for a New World Order?

By Jacqui Barrett-Watts

The World Economic Forum (WEF), the United Nations (UN), the International Monetary Fund (IMF), the Conference of the Parties (COP 28), and the World Health Organization (WHO), to name just a few, have driven an agenda that seems almost relentless. The ambitions of the global elite have whipped up a concoction of spirited and directed zeal, to claim the Earth and fix all the maladies that have spiraled into it confusion and utter chaos! With a cacophonic-sounding chord, Agenda 2030 seems to be the answer to a world in great need of deliverance!

Klaus Schwab, founder of the World Economic Forum (WEF), is one of the grand architects of this steam engine. In their own words, the forum is “deeply anchored in the public and private sectors, the Forum is the only global organization serving this role, bringing together the world’s foremost CEOs, heads of state, ministers and policymakers, experts and academics, international organizations, youth, technology innovators and representatives of civil society in an impartial space with the aim of driving positive change.” [1]

The signing of a document in 2019 aligned the aims of the UN to its counterpart – WEF. This document deals with the “Strategic Partnership Framework outlining areas of cooperation to deepen institutional engagement and jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development.” The partnership identifies six areas of focus:

• financing the 2030 Agenda,
• climate change,
• health,
• digital cooperation,
• gender equality and
• empowerment of women, education and skills. [2]

Alongside these ideas, runs ‘The World in 2050 TWI 2050’ – ‘A global research initiative in support of a successful implementation of the UN 2030 Agenda.’

The Digital Agenda, one of the core areas outlined above, is becoming a real hot topic. In a recent article titled Major companies call digital identity a “necessary evolution” towards Agenda 2030; states that: “Most countries are moving toward digital ID. It will be implemented in tandem with governments, businesses and the public.” [3]

If we move toward a digital agenda, will this have an effect on the private lives of the members of society? Well, “They (the UN) have embraced the system developed by the World Economic Forum (WEF), which is outlined in three new policy briefs from the UN titled, ‘A Global Digital Compact, Reforms to the International Financial Architecture, and The Future of Outer Space Governance.’ The sinister goal is to advance the United Nations as the new world government.” UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres’s “vision for the future” is ultimate control … This is Officially titled “Our Common Agenda,” where Guterres’ “vision” is to be given the green light in September 2024 during an event dubbed, “The Summit for the Future.”

The UN describes this goal to control the entire world as an open, free, secure and human-centered digital future … The United Nations/WEF wants now to not just create a Digital ID for every person on the planet, but eliminating all paper currency means that every person on the planet must also have a bank account. Schwab and the United Nations now want all Digital IDs linked with the bank or mobile money accounts. They argue that this will improve the delivery of social protection coverage and serve to better reach eligible beneficiaries. At the same time, it will track every individual on the planet. [4]

Does this scenario remind you of anything you may have read in the past? A global entity, controlling the international economic framework; in order to secure a hidden, more sinister agenda! ‘As far as the UN’s “vision” for a future global financial system, it is supposed to be harmonized with the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. It would be governed by something called “the apex body” that is yet to be set up. Essentially, the objective is to have people, devices, and entities, all tied up in a connected network that could apparently be centrally administered, seemingly by unelected bureaucrats. The WEF is keen to promote biometric forms of digital ID and claims the technology would serve as a steward of “social inclusion.” The diagrams sourced from the WEF/UN above, show how everything and everyone will seemingly fit into ‘their’ model of Global cohesion needed for Sustainability by 2030”. [5]

What about the implementation of the Human Identification Microchip – Is that also on the Agenda? The use of microchips has long been discussed as the method to store all forms of information in a retrievable data bank. ‘[The] implants are small, radio-frequency identification (RFID) transponders encased in silicate glass, about the size of a grain of rice, and are typically inserted into the skin, often between the thumb and the forefinger, using a syringe. These chips also use near-field communication (NFC) technology. The implanted chip contains a unique ID number that can be linked to external databases, storing personal identification, medical history, and contact information.’ [5] Whilst this may appear to be a somewhat more convenient way to govern society, we must also consider if this would pose an adverse effect on the civil liberties of the populace. While microchips offer appealing benefits in terms of convenience and mobility, they also pose potential risks to cybersecurity, privacy, and health. [6]

Legislation alone cannot guarantee consumer protection, but it also requires shared responsibility among consumers to understand their data rights and among technologists to prioritize cybersecurity during product development. Governments and regulatory bodies must enact laws that protect individuals’ privacy rights and ensure transparency in data management. Additionally, clear guidelines regarding the ownership and control of data stored on microchips are necessary. [7] It should be understood that in order for everything to come together before the official deadline, the criteria for social cohesion must be met. Coincidentally, the WEF’s article published in 2022, cites that a future use of digital technology would also include, ‘Next level of data intermediaries embedded in body, devices, homes, cities, etc.’ “Technology will become more intertwined with the body in the form of implants” – “Brain implants take us one step further and allow us to tap straight into the body’s “operating system”. [8]

The Climate Agenda is another core area. The UN cites 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). ‘The Sustainable Development Goals are the blueprint to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all. They address the global challenges we face, including those related to poverty, inequality, climate change, environmental degradation, peace and justice.’ [9] The ‘Climate Emergency’ Agenda, has been receiving a lot of attention recently.

The COP28 Conference took place in Dubai 30 November –12 December 2023. “To put it simply, the COP is where the world comes together to agree on ways to address the climate crisis, such as limiting global temperature rise to 1.5 degrees Celsius, helping vulnerable communities adapt to the effects of climate change, and achieving net-zero emissions by 2050. More than 70,000 delegates are expected to attend COP28, including the member states (or Parties) of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). Business leaders, young people, climate scientists, Indigenous Peoples, journalists, and various other experts and stakeholders are also among the participants.” [10] And just to show how important it is, it has been announced by the Catholic News Agency that COP28 will be: ‘Attended by Pope Francis sporting a new Encyclical [.] ‘Pope Francis,’ it reads, ‘issues new call for dramatic climate change measures:

• Pope Francis released a new document on the environment that he has described as the second part of his 2015 encyclical Laudato Si’, and which warns of “grave consequences” if humanity continues to ignore the threat of climate change.

• The apostolic exhortation, titled Laudate Deum (Praise God), is meant to address what Francis in the document calls the “global social issue” of climate change. The pope said that in the eight years since Laudato Si’ was published, “our responses have not been adequate” to address ongoing ecological concerns.’ [11]

Until he was forced to cancel his trip to Dubai, it was anticipated that Pope Francis would travel to the United Arab Emirates from 1 to 3 December to attend the United Nations Conference on Climate Change. He was scheduled to arrive at Expo City where the Summit takes place to deliver his speech. It was anticipated that the Pope would take part in a series of private bilateral meetings and “on Sunday, December 3rd, he would inaugurate the Faith Pavilion, which is the portion of the conference where world religious leaders meet to promote climate and policy action.” [12]

As of 6 November 2023, “representatives for the world’s religions have signed an appeal calling for political leaders at COP28 climate summit to take meaningful action to respond to the urgent crisis of climate change. At the conclusion of the ceremony, the appeal was delivered to Dr. Sultan Al Jaber, the President-Designate of COP28. Dr. Al Jaber highlighted the “special significance” of the Abu Dhabi Interfaith Statement for COP28. “Your collective faiths continue to inspire all people to live in harmony with nature and to act to protect our fragile world. And together, you have made a powerful statement of intent that the world needs to live – a statement of urgency, a statement of unity, solidarity, responsibility, and hope that can only help the collective drive for transformation and climate change. Dr. Al Jaber encouraged the faith leaders to continue to mobilize their communities around the world, while promising, on his part, “to carry your message forward to the world through COP28.”

The Pontiff seems incredibly focused on gathering people of all faiths to solidify the objectives contained within the Encyclicals. ‘In October 2022, the Holy See formally joined both the U.N. Framework Convention on Climate Change – the body that oversees the annual climate summits – and the Paris Agreement, the landmark deal where nations committed to slashing heat-trapping greenhouse gas emissions in order to limit average global temperature rise to “well below” 2 degrees Celsius, and strive to hold it to 1.5 C. Exactly one year after the Holy See’s entry into the Paris accord, Francis issued Laudate Deum. And now he is poised to become the first pope to attend a U.N. climate summit.’ [13]

Due to illness at the last minute, however, Pope Francis sent the Cardinal Secretary of State to deliver his speech. ‘In a hard-hitting message, delivered on his behalf by Cardinal Secretary of State Pietro Parolin, the Pope told the COP assembly that his presence serves to remind them that “the destruction of the environment is an offence against God.” [14] The phrase ‘ecological conversion’ derived from his previous Encyclical: Laudato Si, is served as a political whip, to drive forth his vision. In a video message broadcast on the 3rd December, during the inauguration of the first Faith Pavilion at a U.N. climate conference, “both Pope Francis and Sheikh el-Tayeb were shown on video signing the Interfaith Statement on Climate Change for COP28 that had been drafted and signed by more than two dozen other religious representatives at a global faith leaders’ summit in Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates, Nov. 6-7. The statement called for “inclusive dialogue, during and beyond COPs, with faith leaders, vulnerable groups, youth, women’s organizations and the scientific community to forge alliances that strengthen sustainable development,” and it “demands transformative action to keep 1.5 degrees Celsius within reach and serve affected and vulnerable communities.” After praying the Angelus from the Vatican Dec. 3, the pope reiterated his appeal “for a response to climate change with concrete political changes” and asked leaders to leave behind “particularism and nationalism, mindsets of the past, and embrace a common vision, all making every effort now, without delay, for a necessary global conversion.” [15]

With the inception of the “Green Sabbath” or “Climate Sunday”, the Earth will be able to rest one day a week and reduce emissions. Agenda 2030 appears to be the vehicle that is steering forward this mammoth task of gaining the nations of the world to comply with the mandate set in motion by the elite few. The most powerful organizations in conjunction with religious entities are committed to promulgating their sheer thrust for Global dominance. And having thus used the vehicle to its advantage, it can now take vantage ground and, once again, ascend the throne, and rule with absolute power, the nations of the earth subject to her Papal insinuations. Her seat, for now, is assured.

As previously mentioned, The WHO is also committed to the policies outlined within the international substructure. The global interdependence between all states will ensure that eventually, there will be complicit consensus between all of the relevant cohorts. Headlines such as ‘The European Commission and WHO launch landmark digital health initiative to strengthen global health security’ reveal the true level of the sophisticated and intricate bond between the parties for the invention of the Digital Health Passports. In June 2023, the WHO implemented the European Union (EU) system of digital COVID-19 certification to establish a global system that will help facilitate global mobility and protect citizens across the world from on-going and future health threats, including pandemics. [16]

This is the first building block of the WHO Global Digital Health Certification Network (GDHCN) that will develop a wide range of digital products to deliver better health for all.’ ‘This further bolsters a robust multilateral system with WHO at its core, powered by a strong EU.’ ‘Thierry Breton, Commissioner for Internal Market, [added], “With 80 countries and territories connected to the EU Digital COVID-19 Certificate, the EU has set a global standard. The EU certificate has not only been an important tool in our fight against the pandemic, but has also facilitated international travel and tourism. I am pleased that the WHO will build on the privacy-preserving principles and cutting-edge technology of the EU certificate to create a global tool against future pandemics,” [.]

Will these same ‘privacy-preserving principles’ prevent those who refuse to fall into line with the current surge of activity respect the rights and conscience of those who choose to follow an alternative pathway in creating a holistic approach to health? I suspect that time will reveal all. Nevertheless, the WHO still views ‘COVID-19 as a global health threat’.

In fact, Director-General of the WHO Dr. Tedros Adhanom Ghebreyesus stated that, “When the next pandemic comes knocking, and it will, we must be ready to answer decisively, collectively, and equitably,” [17] he advised. This enormous push to save the planet and to come under a common umbrella will no doubt be a decisive factor for the urgent completion of the goals highlighted by the UN and other multinational organizations. Tedros said ‘COVID-19 had significant implications for health-related targets under the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), which have a deadline of 2030.’ [18]

It would seem that the entire population must come into conformity to the will of those who seem to have enormous influence, wealth and prestige. The Great Reset Initiative encapsulates this drive to address the needs of the planet. ‘The initiative’s stated aim is to facilitate rebuilding from the global COVID-19 crisis in a way that prioritizes sustainable development.’ [19]

It is unquestionably clear that there is a power at work to converge all aspects of society as we know it. But to what end? The book, The Great Controversy’ says it well: ‘To the very close of time he [a religious entity] will carry forward the work of deception. And the revelator declares, also referring to the papacy: “All that dwell upon the earth shall worship him…” Revelation 13:8. In both the Old and the New World, the papacy will receive homage in the honor paid to the Sunday institution, that rests solely upon the authority of the Roman Church.’ [20] The Pontiff has been a very vocal voice on establishing a common rest day, for the benefit of families etc. In fact, ‘Bible prophecy foretells the rise of an end-time beast power in central Europe.’

There would yet be another power, the second “beast” ‘who will be a powerful political, military, economic leader who will work in concert with a powerful religious leader’, to do his bidding (see Revelation 13). Ultimately, the second “beast” will cause “all, both small and great, rich and poor, free and slave, to receive a mark on their right hand or on their foreheads, and that no one may buy or sell except one who has the mark, or the name of the beast, or the number of his name” (v 16–17).

Could mandatory Sunday worship be part of this mysterious “mark” of the beast, and could Francis’ “Laudato Si,” (Fratelli Tutti), and now ‘Laudate Deum’ help bring this about?’ The Books of Daniel and Revelation provide the narrative to this end-time scenario and also the book: The Great Controversy. The UN and other multinational corporations are all joining together with a common goal in mind, to try to fix the problems of the world. But it will be of no avail. The narrative set out in the Bible reminds us that freedom as we know it is about to change as we head into the Agenda set out for us by these agencies.

Will the human rights of those who don’t go along with the aims detailed in the agenda respect those who choose to think for themselves or will they be forced against their conscience for the greater good; the common good? In November 2016, the World Economic Forum released a video detailing 8 predictions for the world in 2030; one being that “you’ll own nothing and you’ll be happy”. Is this the real agenda concealed in candy? Will our rights be rescinded if the global initiatives do not coalesce with the mantra and mandates laid out on the proverbial chopping board?

Alvaro de Vasconcelos, Director of the European Union Institute for Security Studies between May 2007 and May 2012, documents in his book: Global Governance 2025: At a Critical Juncture, written in 2010 for the Institute for Security Studies, European Union, says, “the shift to a multipolar world order is complicating the prospects for effective global governance in the coming decade. Against this background, the United States’ National Intelligence Council (NIC) and the European Union Institute for Security Studies (EUISS) have joined forces to produce this assessment of the long-term prospects for global governance frameworks. This report seeks to provide a contribution to an important international debate on the way forward for global, regional and bilateral institutions and frameworks to meet emerging challenges. It is underlined by a strong belief that global challenges require global solutions, which can only be achieved through proactive multilateralist approaches in the future.” [21]

In closing, it would appear that there has long since been an agenda that, one day, will be the very platform that’s been waiting in the wings since the Papal power received its “deadly wound”. It is now in a position where it will reveal its real Agenda. Hidden under a garb of sanctity, it will, as it had always planned, take its seat and ride the governments of the world for its own ends. It’s more than obvious that there has been a push for a new way of doing things. Francis called for a ‘New Economic Order’ back in 2015 at the UN. He has spoken of the SDGs and is also a voice calling for unity. His encyclical: ‘Fratelli Tutti’, calls for a reform of “the United Nations Organization, and likewise of economic institutions and international finance, so that the concept of the family of nations can acquire real teeth”. [22]

Just recently, Joe Biden was reported as saying, in October 2023: A new world order is needed, Biden said at a campaign reception, adding that the U.S. could “unite the world if we’re bold enough and have enough confidence in ourselves.” [23]

In the words of Becky Anderson, CNN, I can only ask one question: ‘Are you ready for a New World Order?’

About: Jacqui Barrett-Watts is a Seventh-day Adventist and religious liberty advocate from the United Kingdom with an interest in religious, political & current affairs. You can reach her at the following email: jacquibarrattwatts@yahoo.co.uk

Sources

[1] Schwab, K. 2023 What makes us Unique? The World Economic Forum Website.

[2] Published 13 Jun 2019. World Economic Forum and UN Sign Strategic Partnership Framework. World Economic Forum. Media: News Releases. World Economic Forum Website.

[3] Dzsurdzsa, Cosmin. June 6, 2023. Major companies call digital identity a <necessary evolution= towards Agenda 2030. True North Publisher. True North is a Canadian digital media platform that seeks to provide Canadians with fair, accurate, truthful and fact-based news reports, analysis, investigative reports, podcasts, interviews and documentaries.

[4] Armstrong, Martin. Jun 23, 2023. UN9s Plan to Rule the World – The Summit for the Future & End of Individualism. Armstrong Economics.

[5] Durden, Tyler. Authored by Frank Bergman via SlayNews.com, June 20, 2023. United Nations Planning Digital ID Linked To Bank Accounts. ZeroHedge.

[6 – 7] August 4, 2023. Assessing the Controversy of Human Identification Microchips: High-tech Surveillance or a Breach in Privacy? BIS Research. Emerging Technology Market Intelligence. LinkedIn.com.

[8] Flanagan, Anne, J. February 2022. WEF Advancing Digital Agency: The Power of Data Intermediaries Insight: Table 1:Digital ID. Pg. 23. Col. 3. World Economic Forum.

[9] Sustainable Development Goals: Take Action for the Sustainable Development Goals. United Nations Webpage: UN.Org/Sustaintable Development Goals.

[10] About COP28. United Nations Climate Change Website: UNFCCC.

[11] Payne, Daniel. October 4, 2023. Pope Francis issues new call for dramatic climate change measures. Catholic News Agency.

[12] 10/11/2023. Pope Francis will address world leaders at the COP28 conference in Dubai on December 2. Rome Reports Website: Romereports.com.

[13] Wells, Christopher. 6 November 2023. Global faith leaders call for urgent action on climate change. Vatican News.

[14] Bordoni, Linda. 2 December, 2023. Pope Francis to COP28: ‘Choose life, choose the future!’ Vatican News.

[15] Glatz, Carol. December 4, 2023. Humanity must build alliances supporting peace, creation, pope says. United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. https://www.usccb.org/news/2023/humanity-must-build-alliancessupporting-peace-creation-pope-says

[16] 5 June, 2023. The European Commission and WHO launch landmark digital health initiative to strengthen global health security. World Health Organization Website: fttps://www.who.int/news/item/05-06-2023-the-europeancommission-and-who-launch-landmark-digital-health-initiative-to-strengthen-global-health-security

[17-19] Pandey, Nikhil. May 24, 2023. WHO Warns Of Next Pandemic, “With Even Deadlier Potential”. NDTV https://www.ndtv.com/feature/world-needs-to-be-prepared-for-the-next-pandemic-who-chief-4060971

[20] White, E. G. 1911 The Great Controversy, 1911 – Liberty of Conscience Threatened. Pg 579. Stanbourough Press.

[21] Vasconcelos, Álvaro de, 2010, Global Governance 2025: At a Critical Juncture. Institute for Security Studies, European Union, 2010 – Globalization. Quote taken from the following link: https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Global_Governance_2025.html?id=_-3MFAbtR3AC&redir_esc=y.

[22] Pope Francis, 3 October, 2020. Fratelli Tutti. Paragraph. 173. The Vatican Publishing House.

[23] Oct 23, 2023.  Kremlin Says Biden Right on New World Order, Wrong on U.S. Role in Building It.  The Moscow Times: https://www.themoscowtimes.com/2023/10/23/kremlin-says-biden-right-on-new-world-order-wrong-on-us-role-in-building-it-a82855