Suscribe to Sister Sheldine Guyton’s YouTube Channel and view the complete presentation at https://youtube.com/@poetryoflovemedia777
Please follow and like us:
0
0
0Sister Sheldine Guyton’s Message: SDAs Dividing While the World Unites
0
000
00
The language itself sounds to be ecumenical in nature. The Seventh Day Adventist Movement ,was started in the mid 19th century, after the dark ages of 1,260 years of papal supremacy. This movement was raised by God to unmask the spiritual darkness in the world perpetuated by the Roman Church. The historicist message of the Seventh Day Adventism was the major pillar and foundation of our faith. The 2300 year prophecy and the sanctuary message laid the foundation pillar of our church. But in the recent years ,our church leadership in the General conference have watered down our message and embraced the ecumenical movements instead of preaching the plain truth of the God’s word?
There is one Seventh Day Adventist Church, universally, however, there are two groups of S.D.A formations? One formation is the S.D.A movement of Philaldephian church of 1863 recognized by the 144,000, which preaches the ”Three angels messages of ( Revelation 14:6-12) and consists of early pioneers and all those ministers who preach the ”Three Angels messages.” The other formation consists of a ”New Organization” which was formed by early S.D.A leaders who rejected counsels from the Messenger of the Lord (Ellen White) not to form the ”New Organization. This New Organization was constituted by the devil himself (Read Ezekiel 9). The early S.D.A leaders were : F.D .Nichol; G.A.Irwin; President A.G . Daniels; Charles .H.Watson; F.M. Wilcox, Russell .F. Cottrell; W.W .Presscott and many others.
So, when you preach the three angels messages you are branded to be divisive, then you’re reffered to as bad Seventh day Adventist? But if you speak good things and sweet flatteries about the ecumenism you are branded as a good Seventh day Adventist? That’s the language Rome wants to hear about? The Ecumenism? Unity among the Churches. What does the second angels message say: Get out of her ? Babylon, So , that ye may not partake into her sins? . This is the message of midnight cry of 1844 by William Miller, which called faithful christians to come out from the fallen churches. But today , our S.D.A church leaders at the G.C, are minglling together in the ecumenical meetings with Sunday keeping churches.
What our faithful brethren in the S.D.A don’t know is that the Ecumenical movement led by Roman Church through the World Council of Churches is the Image of the Beast which will prepare the way for the mark of the beast. Our leaders are collaborating with the man of sin to water and trample down our treasured heavenly message for the sake of unity and ecumenism. This is very sad? For those leaders who go these meetings and address the Pope of Rome as the”Holy Father ” which is prohibited in the bible (Matthew 23:9). I want to tell them shame on them?
I know many people will not like the truth, but that is the naked truth and the truth is always unpopular,the Image of the Beast is going to be formed before the closing scenes of the earth’s history and many people will into the snares of the devil for being negligent and not studying their bibles.
Bill Hughes is WAY off in his comments. He is twisting Andy Roman’s words and making him sound like he’s pandering after the leaders. He is actually LYING! Mr. Roman was able to address some of these GC leaders and stand up for the concerns of the people. Bill Hughes needs to be boycotted.
Dear brothers and sisters, I live in Russia and do not speak English at the proper level, many video materials are not available to me for the same reason.
I do not know what Hughes said, because there is some video where he makes these statements.
I did not watch Hughes’s video, therefore it seems strange to me that such a person as Hughes could not figure out what Andy’s brother had in mind … 🤔
In general, very strange, I would even call this “teenage conflict”, because only teenagers who are not getting stronger in faith are able to quarrel out of the blue … 🤔.
I was surprised by the reaction of the brother of the novel, he was offended, like a young man who has not yet been put into his relationship with Jesus.
He painted all this in his publication that it surprised me very much.
I will now say such a thing, purely theoretical of course, but still,
👇
If you love God, and people (especially the brothers by faith), then even if you allow the idea that Hughes had something in my head there, then you really need to “complain”!?
I’m not trying to take someone’s side now.
Obviously, Satan drives a wedge into God’s people.
But why did E. Roman not say for example:“Dear brother Bill, in fact, I had in mind this and that, this annoying misunderstanding should not play into the hands of our enemy, I admit that it was possible to say otherwise, my brother agrees, but let these words not become the crack that will divide our service to God and the neighbor.
Dear brother Bill, this is a misunderstanding, let’s continue our path next to each other and with Jesus. ”
I hope this misunderstanding will be resolved.
All the day of the Subable
🙂👋