
Listín Diario, founded in 1889, is one of the most important and influential daily newspapers in the Dominican Republic, published in the capital city of Santo Domingo. In its November 9, 2025 article titled “SUNDAY: Constantine’s Legacy as a Day of Rest,” Listín Diario lays out a history that, in effect, advocates for the return of blue laws. After correctly tracing how the Roman Church changed the biblical Sabbath from Saturday to Sunday and sanctified it by ecclesiastical authority, the paper argues that Sunday must now be upheld as the official weekly day of rest to safeguard the physical and emotional health of workers. By presenting Sunday rest not merely as a religious tradition but as a necessary policy rooted in health, well-being, and public order, the article presents Sunday observance as a civic obligation worthy of state support—precisely the rationale historically used to justify Sunday laws and blue-law enforcement.
Listín Diario reported the following history about the change from Saturday to Sunday:
• “The origin of the Sabbath is rooted in the Bible and is found in the book of Genesis (2:2-3), where it is recounted that God, after completing creation, rested on the seventh day, blessed it, and sanctified it. This divine act gave rise to the Fourth Commandment, found in Exodus 20:8-10: ‘Remember the Sabbath day, to keep it holy … the seventh day is a Sabbath to the Lord your God’.” [1]
• “In the Judeo-Christian tradition, the day of rest—the Sabbath—occupies a central place in the spiritual experience, while in modern Western culture, Sunday has acquired both religious and work-related connotations. How did this shift occur? What role did imperial power, nascent Christianity, and current legal norms play in this transformation?” [1]
• “The decisive turning point came on March 7, 321 AD, when Emperor Constantine the Great, ruling a still predominantly pagan Roman Empire, issued an edict declaring Sunday a mandatory day of rest. His edict acted as a civil-religious dogma in the newly emerging imperial Christendom.” [1]
• “This decision was not motivated by Christian beliefs, but rather by cultural reasons: Sunday was the day dedicated to Sol Invictus, the solar deity venerated in the Empire and a symbol of the emperor’s personal faith.” [1]
• “Later, the Synod of Laodicea (363–364 AD) solidified the shift to Sunday. Its 29th canon instructed that ‘Christians should not Judaize by resting on the Sabbath, but rather work on that day and honor the Lord’s Day.’ From this arose the name Dies Dominicus (day of the Lord), origin of the term ‘Sunday’ in many Latin languages.” [1]
• “This change had not only theological implications, but also disciplinary ones: those who persisted in observing the Sabbath were considered anathema, that is, cursed or excluded from the Christian community.” [1]
• “In 1998, the Holy Father John Paul II, in his Apostolic Letter Dies Domini, addressed to the episcopate, the clergy and the faithful on the sanctification of Sunday, recalled the importance of this practice: ‘It is necessary, therefore, to reread the great page of creation and to delve deeper into the theology of the Sabbath, in order to enter into the full understanding of Sunday‘.” [1]
• “Today, weekly rest, and in particular Sunday rest, has transcended its religious meaning to become a labor right recognized in most Western countries.” [1]
• “The history of the day of rest—from the seventh day sanctified by God, to Sunday made official by the Roman Empire, and later turned into labor law—illustrates how religious norms and legal structures intertwine, influencing each other over time.” [1]
• “Today, Sunday rest not only protects the physical and emotional health of workers, but also preserves an ancestral memory, full of symbolism, spirituality and social justice. Thus, each Sunday of rest encapsulates centuries of history, faith, power, and law.” [1]
The Listín Diario article openly acknowledges that the biblical Sabbath is the seventh day, then traces how Constantine’s civil edict and later Catholic Church councils replaced it with Sunday. From there, it elevates Sunday as the true Christian day of worship and argues that Christianity must now find its weekly identity in Sunday observance.
The media then shifts from its faulty theology to public policy, claiming that Sunday rest has “transcended its religious meaning” and become a legally recognized labor right throughout the Western world. When major newspapers argue that Sunday is both the rightful Christian day of worship and a protected labor right necessary for the physical, emotional, and spiritual well-being of society, they are laying the groundwork for a future Sunday law. By mixing bad theology and coercive history with public policy, the article effectively seeks to persuade readers that the state has a responsibility—even a moral duty—to safeguard Sunday.
Once the public is convinced that Sunday is essential for national health and economic stability, the next logical step—especially during times of crisis—is for lawmakers to formalize and enforce it in the name of the “common good.” This is exactly how past Sunday laws emerged: first through moral persuasion, then through appeals to health emergencies, and finally through legal mandates. When Sunday is elevated by major media outlets as an absolute right and necessity, the path toward state enforcement becomes not only possible but, in the eyes of lawmakers, reasonable, justifiable, and ultimately inevitable.
“It will be declared that men are offending God by the violation of the Sunday-sabbath, that this sin has brought calamities which will not cease until Sunday observance shall be strictly enforced, and that those who present the claims of the fourth commandment, thus destroying reverence for Sunday, are troublers of the people, preventing their restoration to divine favor and temporal prosperity … As the wrath of the people shall be excited by false charges, they will pursue a course toward God’s ambassadors very similar to that which apostate Israel pursued toward Elijah” (Great Controversy, p. 590).
Sources
[1] https://listindiario.com/puntos-de-vista/20251109/domingo-legado-constantino-dia-reposo_881520.html
Sunday is the first day of the week? Which means in Roman language as the solis invictus? This was first sunday law enacted by Emperor Constatine which became universal law and edict in the crumbling empire. Therefore Sunday is the venerable day of the sun, compatible with Roman sunworship. Constatine was also known as ”Pontifex Maximus” the priest of Roman gods.The title was finally taken officially by the Popes after they succeded the seat of Rome after Constatine retreated to Constatinople. The Bishop of Rome reigned officially as the head of church and state in the Western Roman empire. Sunday was then officially recognized and passed in the Council of Laodicea in 336 A.D.
Genesis 2:2-3 Clearly God explicitly sanctified ,rested, blessed the Seventh day sabbath as the day of rest and required all the human beings to rest as the sign of perfection during the earth’s creation. Therefore the sabbbath was made for man not the vice versa as many people always think. There was no existence of Jew OR Adventists, because many people think sabbath is meant for Jews and the sabbatarian Adventists. Today in our modern world there are three days of worship recognized universally. Friday (Originated from Mohammed), Saturday (Originated from Jesus) while Sunday originated from Pope). These three days are prophesied in the book of Isaiah 9:14 ; It says; The Lord will cut ISRAEL from both head and tail both palm branch and leaf in the single day. Head in this prophecy represents Pope as the Head of Roman Catholic Church; while Tail represents the false prophet in this case Mohammed.
Therefore God will cut of Head and Tail representing both false days of worship representing Friday and Sunday? God will finally chose his own day of worship which is the sabbath day (Saturday). Also these three days of worship are represented by the three crosses with two thieves and Christ in the middle. Christ was crucified between the two thieves one was unrepentant while the other one repentant and professed his sins and told Christ to remember him during the second coming? The unrepentant thief represents (ISLAMIC religion) which denies that Christ was crucified, and also rejects his salvation . The repentant thief represents the (Apostate CHRISTIANITY) which has been swayed away to believe false doctrines which include immortality of the soul,Child baptism, Sunday Worship.( John 19:18)
In the book of Isaiah 66:22-23; Lord says that all the human beings and all creatures will come before my prescence in the Holy City Jerusalem to worship him throught the eternity? Forever and ever? May Almighty God , help us to strive to become among the first among the equals to come face to face with our creator in the new heavens and the new earth without blemish of sin in the eternal glory ? Amen.
Dearest Andy
Thank you for using your God given talent for “words” which you offer so effectively.
Only in the Kingdom will we know the number of souls you have influenced for Christ.
Please, keep on keeping on Sir.
Blessing!
God does not change nor does He need to. So claiming devine authority from heaven to change God’s sign and seal as the Creator is lie:
“For I am the LORD, I change not; therefore ye sons of Jacob are not consumed. ”
Malachi 3:6 KJV
Lord God our Creator and Redeemer is the Potter, so the Clay can’t claim authority of any kind when it has never been given:
“13 Wherefore the Lord said, Forasmuch as this people draw near me with their mouth, and with their lips do honour me, but have removed their heart far from me, and their fear toward me is taught by the precept of men:
14 Therefore, behold, I will proceed to do a marvellous work among this people, even a marvellous work and a wonder: for the wisdom of their wise men shall perish, and the understanding of their prudent men shall be hid.
15 Woe unto them that seek deep to hide their counsel from the LORD, and their works are in the dark, and they say, Who seeth us? and who knoweth us?
16 Surely your turning of things upside down shall be esteemed as the potter’s clay: for shall the work say of him that made it, He made me not? or shall the thing framed say of him that framed it, He had no understanding? ”
Isaiah 29:13-16 KJV